篇一：影评写作格式
影评的格式和范文
模式一：单角度评析
题目：主标题
——副标题（主题思想、人物形象或者艺术手法）
第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）+中心论点（20字）
第二段：分论点一
第三段：分论点二
第四段：总结（升华主题，并联系现实，提出个人思考）
模式二：多角度评析
题目：主标题
——副标题（不用提出角度，只需要点出评什么电影就可以了）
第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）
第二段：评主题思想（看不出准确的主题思想，可以用感受来代替，但一定要结 合电影情节，不要写成纯观后感）
第三段：评人物形象（可以评一个，也可以评多个）
第四段：评艺术手法（镜头、音乐、台词、画面、色彩等等）
第五段：总结，提出一个总体的评价（弥补开始第一段的中心论点缺失）
模式三：散评式
题目：主标题
——副标题
也可以只用一个题目：比如说“评电影《花火》”
全文自由分段，想到哪儿写到哪儿，可以评价电影的任何一个部分或细节。
注意不要写成观后感，也不要写成电影简介，要注意“叙”“析”“评”相结合。
篇二：影评的格式
阿甘正传观后感（中英文对照）
阿甘有自己的坚持，他不断地跑步，JUST RUNS. 他跑步不为任何理由。他说:"人要往前看，千万不要被过去拖累。我想我跑步就是这个意义”和过去告别，不停留在原处。也许这世界上太多人随拨逐流，很少人会坚持做一件事，阿甘坚持自己的坚持，于是他成了“神”。影片中还有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南战争中失去了双腿。他说他的命运就是战死。然而阿甘却救他，让他活了下来。失去双腿后他开始憎恨生活，生活得很颓废，责怪阿甘当初救了他。然而当他调整心态，去和阿甘一起捕鱼生活，有了收获后，开始感觉到生活的美好。感谢阿甘当初就了他。影片试图通过这个角色告诉观者生活总是美好的。乌云后有彩虹，绝境后有重生。关键是看我们给不给自己一个好心态，一个机会去改变不好的现状。影片试图向观者传达这样一个信息：或许做好我们该做的每一件事，生活就会给我们一个好的回馈。只要有一种坚持就会出现一个奇迹。
Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS.
He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank that's the
meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many
people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing,
Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his
legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him
and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life,
complaining that A Gan shouldn't save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing
with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gan's help. The movie is
intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always
after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportuni
ty to
ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do
well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if
only there is perseverance.
Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the
task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.
《冒牌天神2》观后感:
This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.
Evan Almighty apparently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't have attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.
It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.
这是<猫鼠游戏>的英语影评.对Frank 和Carl之间关系的评论
It’s correct to describe Carl as a cat, also Frank as a mouse. Not only because the process that the cat chased the mouse day and night, but also Carl was as mild as a cat, not as violent as a tiger.
Carl is only a clerk in FBI. He sticked to the regulations but didn’t lose his compassion. Years of detective work let him lose his lovely daughter, but didn’t make him ruthless. Though Carl was teased by the clever mouse several times, he still did not treat Frank as a criminal. He regarded Frank as a little boy, who should be lead on the right way.
The brilliant mouse, Frank endured too much heartbreak in his childhood. Father’s bankruptcy, parents’ divorce drove him to go astray. He deceived every person he met. But at the Christmas Eve, Frank told the truth to Carl on the phone. He was so lonely at that time. Even though he was a great con man, don’t forget, Frank was still a teenager who was interested in the comic books. He needs family. He needs love. All the fraud he made was aim at repairing his family.
Then, when the two people who both had broken family were involved with each other, a new relationship was founded.
Carl wasn’t as handsome as Frank Sr. He did not have little tricks such as “the lost necklace”. But he appreciated Frank’s genius and taked a long time to rescue Frank. He knew he would try in vain to do it. But he still loved Frank, and treated Frank as his own child.
It was incredible that a cat would love a mouse. But Carl did it.
Fortunately, Frank gave up evil and returned to good with Carl’s help.
Although I think it was sad that Frank was also a clerk in FBI at last. It wouldn’t be exciting for our audience. But after years of crazy, Frank needed to live like a common person, just as his happy childhood in France.
Remember, Frank’s peace life should be attributed to Carl, who was clement enough. It’s Carl that makes the film full of love. Perhaps the relationship between them should be called “The cat father and the mouse son”. 有两部分的问题要注意
1 是影评，就像写语文作文一样，关键要有真情实感，你自己看完这部电影到底什么想法。
2 将中文用英语表达出来。这部分翻译的时候注意要是有句子觉得翻的不好，宁可不要用这句句子而换成别的容易用英语表达的句子。对我们来说，换中文句子要比换英语句子简单多了。
如何写影评
编辑：yanmin5688 来源： 点击数：804 更新时间：2009-11-20
一般来说，影评属于夹叙夹议的议论文。这种文体主要以一般现在时态介绍剧情内容及发表自己的看法。什么时候观看或电影曾获得什么奖项可转入过去时态。人称通常采用第一、第三人称。
【基本格式】
影视评论适宜用“三段式”写法。
第一段：简介背景(setting)。对电影的名称、特点、导演等作简单介绍。
第二段：情节概述(main plot of the film)。包括主要演员及故事梗概。电影简介不宜太长，只需把自
己要评论的内容突出即可。
第三段：观后感受，发表评论（making comments / review in some way）。可以选择性地从不
同角度对电影的主题、情节、人物形象的塑造、语言风格、演员的演技、画面特点、环境、颜色的搭配及拍摄理念的使用等方面有针对性地发表个人看法，但不要面面俱到。最后对电影总体评价。如果认为有必要，也可鼓动其他人观看。
【常用句式】
1. 对影片的概述
The film was directed by …
The film tells us a real story.
The film … directed by … is a story about …
The film … is set in …
The film is a love (romantic / moving) story.
2. 对影片的积极评价
This is a very touching film, a must-see.
… give an amazing performance in the film.
My favourite part of the film is …
Judging from the wild clapping and cheers that filled the cinema, everybody agreed that it was indeed the best film of the year.
3. 对影片的消极评价
However, many people have complained that the film is too …
Another common complaint is that the film …
I’m disappointed with the film because …
篇三：影评的格式和范文
影评的格式和范文
模式一：单角度评析
题目：主标题
——副标题（主题思想、人物形象或者艺术手法）
第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）+中心论点（20字）
第二段：分论点一
第三段：分论点二
第四段：总结（升华主题，并联系现实，提出个人思考）
模式二：多角度评析
题目：主标题
——副标题（不用提出角度，只需要点出评什么电影就可以了）
第一段：电影风格（30字）+电影梗概（150字）
第二段：评主题思想（看不出准确的主题思想，可以用感受来代替，但一定要结 合电影情节，不要写成纯观后感）
第三段：评人物形象（可以评一个，也可以评多个）
第四段：评艺术手法（镜头、音乐、台词、画面、色彩等等）
第五段：总结，提出一个总体的评价（弥补开始第一段的中心论点缺失）
模式三：散评式
题目：主标题
——副标题
也可以只用一个题目：比如说“评电影《花火》”
全文自由分段，想到哪儿写到哪儿，可以评价电影的任何一个部分或细节。 注意不要写成观后感，也不要写成电影简介，要注意“叙”“析”“评”相结合。
本模式例文可以参考《影视传媒专业高考指南》一书中139页：“黑暗中的花火——评析北野武《花火》
我的眼里只有你
——徐静蕾电影《一个陌生女人的来信》主题思想之浅析
《一个陌生女人来信》是继《我和爸爸》之后，老徐导演的第二部作品，与后者不同的是，这部作品改编自大家耳熟能详的茨葳格的同名小说，这便被赋予了博大的精神内涵。那么老徐是否能够传神地演绎这段故事呢？答案是肯定的，在一段清脆的古典音乐中，电影以民国北平作为时代地域背景展开了这段凄美的爱情故事，整个影片的色调始终是灰暗的，像是由一张张泛黄的茶色相片拼接而成，时光的碎片就这样一览无余地展现在观者眼前，造成一种老照片的感觉。在昏黄的灯光下，悲凉的音乐中，作家男人坐在黑暗中看信，一封信引起了所有的故事，由那位弥死女人娓娓道来。女人用她的一生向我们阐述了一个神圣伟大的主题——那份独一无二的纯粹的炽热的爱情。
免费论文网友情提示：本网站所有内容为共享上传提供，不涉及任何商业利益，本站对此不承担任何保证责任！
Copyright © www.csmayi.cn Corporation, All Rights Reserved 共享时代 共享你我他 版权所有